short feminism thoughts
so i recently watched a video about a feminist saying that a man should gallantly defend her premise as a person, so she doesn’t have to demand respect for herself.
i was thinking about the entitlement attitude, and i noticed that it is a desire for men to express one specific female behaviour which we don’t do anymore, that pack mentality. i recall some instances where women act as a group to fend off predation and coddle “the vulnerable”. which simply seems to be falling out of favor and into dissonance within our individualistic culture.
honor and allegiance are expression of foolishness in our corporate world. and they are very expensive attributes to cultivate in a friend, rather than an entitlement. in a very prosex culture where ‘cheating’ is unsurprising and acceptable this degree of significance is made unlikely because it is often more of a liability than a boon.
similarly ethnic, and religious affiliation is often experienced as too expensive for the product and service received.
just found out men go to clubs because due to the age requirements it acts as a method to screen out underage girls. so the guy doesn’t commit accidental rape. i guess that does actually make teh behavior in clubs a part of culture rather than just alcohol culture.
so i could go to a club despite not liking alchohol.
the pain and reason causing misogyny
this post wont vindicate misogyny. nor will it cast women as bad. it just explores some concepts related to the practice.
misogyny like all hate is an expression of pain, and frustration. it rationalizes and inters the experiances in best manner possible accepting the data. and the answer is that the other party was guilty. the other party knew the rules and obligations, and broke the trust. that party broke the trust either with consideration or choice or instinct. so to rationalize the circumstance, the blame is externalized to the other person.
at this point, it is just that one person who is the asshole. so they part ways, and the asshole gets written off. but then it happens again, this time it is harder to discard as a random occurence. still the person accumulating negative perception of the group doesn’t blame their preferences for the choice of company, but the company itself. these perceptions accumulate, and eventually clot, as a heart attack of prejudice which caricatures the person for the group they belong to; the mind is made up, and they are bad.
i just read an article about a girl who started doing porn while in a relationship with a guy. she never told the guy, someone else did. this type of experience seems like it could be sufficient pain to cause a hatred of the other gender. in another thread there was revenge porn site, where ex boyfriends posted porn of their ex girlfriends. and i can see that as similarly causing misandry.
people will find out their trust was violated, and i believe it would make it harder for the person to trust a member of the offending group later on.
i’m seriously considering being more outgoing but distrustful, with more significant perception of others as ‘less human’. people seem a traitorous bunch, and the best way to not get hurt is just to not trust and be blatantly dishonest. idk though i think it would sadden me to adopt that kind of mask.
so now the word myth is referring to baseless allegations. and there is enough lexical shit i’m at the point of just saying “screw this language” i’m gettign off.
the powerful want to put limits on stuff to realize their power. just another reason law should expire. so they are able to make meaningful ‘change’ to steady the course, without making things worse.
“the tech community is actually dominated by white males.”
for a long time, that made little sense to me. does the speaker mean dominated as in domination and dominion, or as in domain. and just now it hit me. it is a commentary on plurality based on the presumption of majority rule democracy.
so since the people here aren’t foreigners, they are incumbents which foreigners can’t compete with due to racism/sexism. it is an anti-ethic argument which deplores the existence of a work culture as a work culture could be dissonant with personal preferences.
… holy fuck. they are actually misapplying democracy to ethnic grouping. because ‘tyranny sucks’. wow…
there is something in the word ‘pathetic’ as colloqueally used by the plurality which conveys a sense of being the exact opposite or a preference or ideal. idk the word for it though.
it has a sense of being unacceptable, deplorable, and possible contemptible. maybe it is a deplorations? repulsions?
“you represent the opposite of what you should”… hmmm
i think i’ll use deploration